farm
PROFIT OVER YIELD: University of Illinois data found the top-third most profitable farms strove for the most profitable yield rather than the highest yield.

Characteristics of financially resilient farms

With lower farm profitability, suggested management strategies will help boost savings.

By Robert Tigner

During the last 10 years, the economic environment that U.S. farms faced has been extremely variable. During 2009-12, incomes and net returns increased, and in 2013-14, they peaked. Production costs rose with the increasing income and began to decline in 2013, however, not as rapidly as revenue declined. Farm profitability declined due to the narrowing margins for grain production. The question for farmers is "What management strategies will consistently produce profits?"

Factors for success
First, let's look at what works for some real farms. Nicholas Paulson and Dale Lattz, ag economists at the University of Illinois, have used Illinois farm data to separate Illinois farms into profitability thirds, as well as time periods 2010-12 (higher prices) and 2014-16 (lower prices). They found a few management strategies that consistently produced higher returns.

The third with the highest-profit farms produced more gross revenue per acre than either of the other two groups through a combination of slightly higher yields and price per bushel for corn and soybeans. Both yields and prices were 5% to 7% higher. None of the farms strove for the highest possible yield, but rather the most profitable yield.

In 2010-12, the top third farm group had $112 more return to land and operator than the middle third group of farms. During that period, high-profit farms had nearly the same per-acre direct costs of production as the middle-third farms, but in 2014-16 their costs were $6 less.

High-profit farms had lower per-acre machinery, depreciation and repair costs — $17 lower in 2010-12 and $10 lower in 2014-16. The top-third high-profit farms had lower per acre overhead costs, too — $8 less in 2010-12 and $18 less in 2012-16.

The relative importance of revenue vs. costs for higher profits also varied during the two time periods. For farms in the higher-profit third, higher revenues contributed more during 2010-2012 and lower costs contributed more to higher returns in 2014-16, compared to the other farms.

The take-home message from this data is twofold. Capturing higher revenue during times of rising commodity prices is more important than managing costs. However, farm operators must not lock in costs during these good times that can't be reduced when prices decline. During times of declining commodity prices, controlling costs is more important.

Steps to resiliency
During this period of tight profits and cash flow, here are some suggestions for management:

• Control costs. Evaluate inputs to ensure there is a positive return to their use. For instance, soybean seeding rates might be reduced with little change in yield but at a much lower cost. Review nitrogen rates to ensure you are using the correct rates and not adding economically unbeneficial N. Look for good feed sources that are less costly but provide the same nutrients. Can you work with neighbors to jointly buy inputs such as seed to get bigger discounts?

• Renegotiate cash rent rates. This can be hard to do since Nebraska property taxes have risen recently, but one way to manage this negotiation is to include flexible lease provisions in case of high yields or prices.

• Reduce capital spending. Most farmers have already done this, but if the purchase reduces costs and cash flow, it may be a good move. Otherwise, repair machinery.

• Reduce family living. Family living rose during the good times in ag, but now family budgets should be reviewed. The nice-to-have items will likely be dropped in favor of the must-haves, such as health insurance. Review cellphone plans, satellite TV, the Sirius/XM subscriptions and any automatic payments. Do not use credit cards for family living. Credit card use could lead to even more debt that can't be serviced.

• Increase revenues. If you have unused or minimal-use assets, such as the extra semi, consider renting them to someone else. Make sure you capture all variable costs first and some or all fixed costs of the asset. Have a crop marketing plan that considers today's marketing environment and your cash flow needs. Execute the plan.

• Increase non-farm income. Many spouses already work off-farm to get benefits and health insurance, but everyone in the farm operation may have to do so. Consider what your skills are and whether the non-farm income will reduce farm income. You may find that planting is delayed, which could be more costly than the additional non-farm income. Can a side business be added? Maybe you have a hobby that can produce income.

These suggestions could take some very serious conversations and open communication within farm families, but the viability of the farm is at stake.

Tigner is a Nebraska Extension agricultural systems economist educator. This report comes from UNL CropWatch.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish